Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N-Tegrity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. - Bobet 13:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] N-Tegrity

Contested prod. Non-notable company fails WP:CORP, despite the creator's undoubtedly sincere protestations otherwise. Includes nice big link to the company's homepage. The creator's only contribs relate to data security software, including edits to Password manager and Disk encryption software that helpfully point readers of these articles to the company's web page. I am also nominating these related pages for deletion:

• N-Pass
• N-Crypt

VoiceOfReason 19:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete all per nom. The company did have a court case against Verizon dismissed, but thats about as notable as it gets. Yomangani 22:11, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment to Yomangani: The company did NEVER have a court against Verizon, neither against other company or institution. I will highly appreciate if your notes will be more reliable. Concerning "notability" - several government and public institutions in Israel and Europe has selected the company as a security services provider and its products as a solution of choice. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eugene Cuprin (talk • contribs) 01:37, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I apologize, I thought perhaps this press release was saying they did was a reliable source [1] Yomangani 09:54, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

• N'TEGRIRTY - Has had a court, however n-Tegrity is a product, developed by n-Trance security, which has nothing common with the abovementioned company --Eugene Cuprin 12:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

I do apologize: I was misled by the nomination implying it was a company rather than a product (and by the complete lack of anthing but bullet points in the article). However, discounting this just means it is less notable, so my opinion stands. Yomangani 13:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Read WP:CORP very carefully. I have, and I see three criteria, none of which is having been selected by several government and public institutions in Israel and Europe as a security services provider. VoiceOfReason 11:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment to VoiceOfReason: Pointing of reader to the company's web page was removed. Both n-Pass and n-Crypt are outstanding software applications that include multiple unparallel features. Their only fault was to be developed by "non-notable" company. Let it be. So delete the company info and keep the software, which methodically belongs to Password manager and Disk encryption software sections. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eugene Cuprin (talk • contribs) 01:37, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

They may be outstanding, they may be unparalleled, but they are not notable by the standards specified in WP:SOFTWARE. Regarding "methodically": you keep on using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. And please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~). VoiceOfReason 11:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Excuse my lack of punctuality --Eugene Cuprin 12:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete all per nom. Typical self-interest editing pattern. JonHarder 20:39, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Don't delete - Please pay attention to the newly added links to independent reviews of the product and the company under the category "Reviews and external links" Northern

Where would they be? Yomangani 13:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete all. None of the three pass WP:SOFTWARE or even a Google test. Fairsing 17:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.