Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mwah

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:06, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mwah

Non-encyclopaedic. I doubt that anything useful can be made of this... Kwekubo 01:47, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. I was considering putting this up for deletion myself for the same reason. Psy guy ^(talk) 02:02, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not encyclopedic. Jaxl | talk 02:16, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Certainly not encyclopedic. Heck, its barely dictionaric (if that makes any sense). --Ektar 08:06, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not encyclopedic. the wub "?/!" 10:31, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Such a shame to see it go, sweetie, but really must delete, daahling. Peeper 15:04, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, another Urban Dictionary candidate. Mcfly 16:45, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Mwah, delete I'd say. JFW | T@lk 20:57, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.