Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muse magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect, the article was a lesser copy of Muse (magazine). The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 22:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Muse magazine

Contested prod which does not assert the notability of the subject magazine. Reason for contesting was "If this is a real magazine I don't see why it should be deleted. A stub template may be more appropiate. I've done some minor changes." MER-C 08:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to Muse (magazine). Uncle G 08:54, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per Uncle G to Muse (magazine) which clearly establishes notability (same publisher as Cricket and Smithsonian mag) and thus sufficiently large circulation). - Mgm|^(talk) 09:17, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. PJM 12:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect seems pretty obvious that this is an article created without knowledge of the already existing one. Drak 14:44, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. --Alynna 21:58, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.