Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murphy's laws-all

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:30, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Murphy's laws-all

Listcruft with a horrible article name; evidently, this stuff wouldn't fit into the Murphy's Law article, so it got shuffled off to a separate article. Brianyoumans 07:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Unnecessary cruft. Danny Lilithborne 08:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Just complete bollocks. BTLizard 09:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Redundancy.--Húsönd 17:46, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Bollocks indeed. .V. 14:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.