Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mout (goddess)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge. Sigh. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 06:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mout (goddess)

Duplicate of Mut. This romanization of the name appears rarely used in English, although it may be more common in French. I know little about hieroglyphs, but what I do know suggests that the version on Mut is accurate, and not the one here (which has no determiner).  –Aponar Kestrel (talk) 14:07, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

• Mergeand Redirect with Mut. Mout looks better, and the two together would be better. Why is this on AfD? Dominick ^(TALK) 14:21, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

  Because I didn't think anyone would ever type "Mout (goddess)" into the search bar. (And WP:NC indicates the most common name should be used, not what "looks better".) And we have MOUT. If I had any other attestations of "Mout" in English, I'd have made a redirect and disambiguation page, but the only two relevant hits in the first hundred of "mout -military -infantry" were French, not English.  –Aponar Kestrel (talk) 14:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

  Redirects are cheap. This should never have gone within a hundred metres of AfD. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 06:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect and merge, of course. --Tone 19:35, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Mut. Stifle (talk) 22:05, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Mut JohnM4402 06:25, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.