Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moralityphobia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 10:55, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Moralityphobia

Little used neologism with only 23 hits on Google, created with the explanation "We'll see how long this POV article lasts, as opposed to , say, the homophobia article which has lasted for a long time". Falls under the policy "Do not disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point (or indeed for any other reason)". Warofdreams talk 16:49, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - Warofdreams talk 16:49, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. Those 23 hits are about six distinct hits, BTW. Tonywalton  | Talk 16:55, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Utter nonsense. Do not merge. Exploding Boy 17:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to Heterophobia. I created the Moralityphobia article and was not aware that there was already another parallel article. MPS 17:08, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism, bit of WP:POINT too. Reminds me of the Islamophilia/Ameriphobia mess. Rhobite 17:19, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  • It should remind you of this mess. See below. Uncle G 18:26, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• I knew that we've had this before. But it took me a while to find it. See Moralphobia (AfD discussion). I draw Rhobite's attention to who the nominator was. ☺ Uncle G 18:26, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Heh, I thought we'd had this discussion before too but I couldn't remember the article. Turns out I nominated moralphobia for deletion. Good find.. Rhobite 21:12, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment whoever nominated that one. you'll find it was I (who wasn't even around back then) who first placed the afd tag on Moralityphobia, in fact, but I was beaten to it on the afd2 tag.I have no axe to grind here. Tonywalton  | Talk 22:26, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Warofdreams and do not merge. neologism and basically incomprehensible nonsense. Kewp (t) 19:31, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete & do not merge as per Rhobite. ~⌈Markaci⌋ 2005-10-12 T 00:42:04 Z
• Even Jesus can't save this tripe. I vote Delete without merge, evil intolerant liberal that I am. --Last Malthusian 10:47, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unless documented claims to its common usage can be produced. -Seth Mahoney 03:24, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

• I call for a final vote here. The horse is dead. Moralphobia is a better term anyways [1]MPS 02:50, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.