Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. DS 14:34, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Montography

A photographic image technique, not apparently widely known or published, except on the inventor's web page. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:00, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable (but who doesn't love a "crystal [that] possess[es] super-artistic powers"?). Joe 03:10, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, "vanity photographic effect"...vanity? Royboycrashfan 03:21, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah, the author threw that into the description after I described it that way in my PROD tag, which he or she removed... a little odd. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 03:24, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

  o_0 Agreed Royboycrashfan 03:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment I think perhaps the article means to say that the technique is a vanity one, scilicet that it relates to the appearance of the photograph and is unnecessary for the production of any given photo (he/she means to employ, I think, the physical and not the metaphysical sense of the word)... Joe 04:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, WP:VSCA. Haikupoet 02:41, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Don't Delete, this is not by any means a widely known technique which is why it must be defined. Please have a look at [1] for more examples of this wonderful and amazing technique. He built the lens himself it must be montography? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thestatebird (talk • contribs) 04:13, April 10, 2006 (UTC) (User's ninth edit)

• Comment That "this is not by any means a widely known technique" seems to militate strongly against its inclusion in the encyclopedia. Joe 04:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

• • Comment WP is neither a promotional venue nor a web host. Try Geocities, or perhaps pitch it to a trade magazine or a DIY magazine. Haikupoet 04:21, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Time seems to move faster in a montaaaage ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 06:44, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete this "innovation" sounds and looks identical to kaleidoscopic and prismatic multi-image filter systems - as have been in use and production for decades. It certainly is not called "montography". I know for a fact that these systems were in use in the 1970s, but were almost certainly in use long before that. Grutness...wha? 07:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.