Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monday-Thursday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 18:54, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Monday-Thursday

Unreferenced article about alleged holiday arrangements in the British (?) construction industry. Reads like an hoax. -- RHaworth 19:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Speedy delete as incoherent nonsense. --Thorsten1 19:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC) (changed, --Thorsten1 08:36, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• It's a parody, not an encyclopaedia article. The part about the U.K. monarch distributing "Monday-Thursday money" to the poor is a parody of Maundy money, for example. "Visita lepubba" is pretty obviously not a real phrase in any of the languages of the Philippines, for another example. Delete. Uncle G 19:38, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as obvious hoax. - Smerdis of Tlön 20:11, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as nonsense - article taged.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 20:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: DragonflySixtyseven made this into a redirect to Maundy Thursday, removing the (speedy) deletion tags. I'm reverting this because it implies that Maundy Thursday had some relation to "Monday-Thursday", which it does not. The term "Monday-Thursday" simply doesn't exist as such and should not appear on WP, not even as a redirect. Also, the redirect solution would leave utterly non-sensical content easily available in the history, and I just don't see the point in that. --Thorsten1 08:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.