Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minor Characters of 6teen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 00:19, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Minor Characters of 6teen

Wikipedia is not a fan site -- Scientizzle 00:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, encyclopedic at the least. Royboycrashfan 01:03, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep There are many pages with lists of minor characters. According to WP:FICT, minor characters should be kept in a list in the actual series article, or (if it is too long) it is "good practice" to keep them in their own article. As this is a long list, it seems fair that the article should be kept. -- ConDem^Talk 01:06, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 03:08, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as fancruft. Brian G. Crawford 03:14, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Never heard of it, but it seems like a notable animated series. Merging minor characters to a list is common practice. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:32, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. WTF is fancruft. Seem verifiable to me. For great justice. 04:06, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
  • See Wikipedia:Fancruft.--Isotope23 16:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, this is encyclopedic, we have List of minor characters in Harry Potter. --Terence Ong 07:36, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Merge back to 6teen where this ridiculously crufty list can be culled and pruned. Failt that, Delete. We do not need this. Eusebeus 09:27, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per ConDem James Kendall [talk] 11:06, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep by [[User: @samisami@ | If we have lists of other minor characters, how come we can't have this extra article?
• Keep per condem. Bucketsofg 12:06, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per all. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:28, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Originally was going to say merge to 6teen but article is at freaking 35 kb already... this article is pretty crufty and could probably use a good hard edit, but I suspect anyone who would edit it is too old to have the vaguest idea where to begin.--Isotope23 16:34, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. We have fancruft from all over the place. At least this is not a one-line article. But it needs a lot of cleanup. --RabidMonkeysEatGrass 21:05, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, far better than each one having its own article. Stifle (talk) 23:16, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - this article is in accordance with standard practice even though I've not heard of 6teen. Metamagician3000 04:48, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all minor characters lists. nn. Carlossuarez46 05:56, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
• KeepWe will need to refer on this character page if we needed to know others. Anyways, Wikipedia needs a refering article of a popular show.
• Merge per Eusebeus. MikeBriggs 16:49, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.