Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mingebag

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mingebag

I'm all for putting stuff on Wikipedia that die-hard Wikipedians consider unencyclopedic, but do we really need one for "The name people use in Garry's Mod when they haven't changed their name"? I mean, for crissake, it's the old-fashioned "Player" problem. There ain't no need for it on Wikipedia. (BTW, if I'm really screwing this up, I'm sorry. This sort of thing is a but daunting...) Scumbag 08:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as things made up online one day. --Dhartung | Talk 09:25, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Deletebag as nom. Not even referenced in the article it refers to. D- for effort. Onebravemonkey 09:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, worst idea for an article I've seen in a while. Recury 13:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Dhartung. --Nishkid64 21:46, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT and above. Wryspy 19:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:RS. Not deleting based on nom; deletions of articles should only happen because of a violation of policies, which nomination doesn't address (formatting is fine, but see if you can find a deletion category that this fits into). Captainktainer * Talk 02:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, gamecruft per WP:NOT and WP:V -- The Anome 18:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

DGG - 25 September 2006 Do not delete, it's usefull information, it teaches you something, and you're just a jackass anyways if you want to bother to delete something like this, like "OMG It's a small article that you will only find if you search for it, it must be the deleted or the wikipedia is teh brokenzor and ccannot be teh healed again!

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.