Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midwayer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 19:45, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Midwayer

Two paragraphs copied and pasted from Aaron Donahue. Google can't find any association between midwayers and Donahue except for the WP article, although the term gets a number of results without the Donahue reference, so the article as it's written is completely unverifiable. The article survived VfD in July 2004, but got deleted anyway in October 2004 for reasons unclear. --howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 00:16, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

• del Nonnotable . Only 102 unique google hits, half of them come from Urantia fancruft sites; I don't know how thy are related to Donahue. mikka (t) 00:30, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Urantia Redirect to Aaron Donahue, per below. It's notable enough that I've heard of it, and I'm definitely not interested in Urantia. (I mean that I've heard of these "midwayers," not their association with Donahue.) - AdelaMae 05:37, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Aaron Donahue, which (as Howard pointed out) is where the content came from in the first place. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 10:27, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Aaron Donahue. --Merovingian 13:18, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per user:mikkalai Pilatus 17:48, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. --Locke Cole ^{(talk) (e-mail)} 07:28, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.