Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mididrift

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Renata3 06:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mididrift

NN , note the cover upload summary the author made it himself on photoshop (!?) Melaen 02:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete fails WP:Music. Durova 03:13, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep verifiable and I'm an inclusionist... Jcuk 06:50, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete because, first and foremost, they do not meet WP:MUSIC guidelines. Add to this 1) No assetion of notability 2) "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" (WP:NOT) 3) Doesn't seem verifiable except through original research: a google search using their "highlights" to eliminate false positives turns up one angelfire page and nothing else. Inclusionist or deletionist, votes need to be based on the article, not ones own general leanings. --Qirex 08:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, WP:NMG. PJM 01:56, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.