Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Kirshenbaum

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. — Trilobite (Talk) 03:04, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Kirshenbaum

Although the article is now the kind of thing that would obviously be a candidate for speedy deletion, it has become so via various edits (some of them transparently silly) from an original that would not have been a candidate for speedy deletion but instead looks like an unverifiable vanity page. It's not particularly easy to decide the version to which I might revert this, so I'm not reverting. Even at its best, though, I say it should be deleted. -- Hoary July 9, 2005 08:51 (UTC)

Delete as per above. Summarised my thoughts exactly. -- Natalinasmpf 9 July 2005 10:45 (UTC)

• Delete as per above: current version is nonsense, original version was non-notable, possibly vanity. --Moritz 9 July 2005 11:16 (UTC)
• Delete "Expect 7 albums from him and his symphony by as early as 2006" Enough said--Porturology 9 July 2005 11:38 (UTC)
• Delete nannity and crystal ball usage, whichever version is reverted to -Splash 9 July 2005 14:20 (UTC)
• Delete Pretty clear delete I think. If this person is noteable, the article should be expanded to justify it...Wikilibrarian 02:43, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn vanity as it was, now it's just contentless. --Etacar11 03:32, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable vanity. JamesBurns 07:16, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.