Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metro Coyuya

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash^talk 22:51, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Metro Coyuya

NN, Little content ; stub since March ; one wikilink here is not substantial ; someone rv to remove speedy del so I am bringing it here. This is a One-liner article on a NN subway station. Terry 15:49, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

• Comment. You have my sympathies, but there is clear precedent to include metro stations, wherever they may be, as inherently notable. Dottore So 16:38, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. Something should still be done with it, though. Expand? Or, perhaps, the precedent could be altered, to merge metro station articles into one for each line (or whatever). --Jacqui M Schedler 20:16, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Personally, I agree fully that putting individual stations into a general article about a particular line makes a lot more sense. However, the larger precedent is that each station is considered notable enough to deserve its own article. Hence, this should be left as a stub. Eventually someone will write a few lines on it. I think that Terry was (completely understandably) unaware of the low threshhold for notability when it comes to metros - also schools, pokemon, Sar Trek, etc... :) Dottore So 22:01, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep expanded article, thanks Hajor. Isn't it great that we can have comprehensive coverage of metro stations without fighting all the time? Kappa 00:09, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• Comment well I am still new here and to me it just doesnt make sense, does anyone know the history on why individual stations are included without significant notable content or history of that station? or at least clue me in on the secret? --Terry 01:24, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep after expansion. -- ElBenevolente 02:05, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to Mexico City Metro, or to a line-specific article. There doesn't seem to be any point in breaking this into a separate article, even with Hajor's information. There's no evidence that any conceptually larger article became overfull, and I'm hesitant to break things into subarticles unnecessarily. -- Creidieki 04:37, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. –Hajor 19:54, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and Delete into parent line is my vote. But where is the precedent set? How can we change this? Like Creidieki there obviously is no overflow from another article and not enough in this one to credit for a new article worth of an encyclopedic entry. --Terry 14:30, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.