Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merentha Mudlib
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. If someone wants to info for merging, please contact me or another admin. --Fang Aili 說嗎? 15:47, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Merentha Mudlib
Doesn't meet WP:SOFT. 838 Ghits. Rory096(block) 22:25, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:SOFTWARE. Stifle (talk) 00:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 14:50, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 14:50, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:SOFTWARE. Innovation, notability, other criteria not asserted in article. Colonel Tom 01:12, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. I deleted this and then restored it; I hadn't realized it had been relisted. Chick Bowen 05:44, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. WP:SOFTWARE is only a proposed guideline. Should we really be deleting according to it yet? Vashti 22:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Sure. Given that you don't need any "consensus" reason to delete an article, after all we could just write "delete per nom". Specifying WP:SOFTWARE at least gives some reasons and suggestions. Stifle (talk) 16:25, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete, then - can't find any indication of notability.Merge to LPMud as per Atari2600tim Vashti 18:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Sure. Given that you don't need any "consensus" reason to delete an article, after all we could just write "delete per nom". Specifying WP:SOFTWARE at least gives some reasons and suggestions. Stifle (talk) 16:25, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into somewhere related to LP mudlibs. It seems noteworthy enough for me to have created the article (there are a few ways that it's unique, and has some advantages over other mudlibs in some areas), and I made the stub in hopes that someone who uses it might improve the article. But, I am not interested enough and also don't have the time to expand it in any significant way myself. Nobody's seems to have expanded it in the several months of its existance, so I think that's enough lack of interest that I'm fine with it being deleted. Also I forgot why I created this article and not one about Merentha itself... I think it was so that Category:LPMud_mudlibs would be more complete. This should probably be merged somewhere like that. --Atari2600tim (talk • contribs) 22:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
