Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Rochell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. -- King of Hearts ^talk 23:00, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Megan Rochell

Delete as non-notable artist; signed to a major label, but hasn't yet released an album or met any of the WP:MUSIC criteria. —LrdChaos 02:05, 13 March 2006 (UTC) I'm also nominating You Me and The Radio, as that page is for the artist's first, as-yet unreleased, album. —LrdChaos 02:10, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Fails WP:MUSIC per nom. --lightdarkness ^(talk) 02:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. BrownHairedGirl 02:11, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The article will reappear as soon as the single/album is released (and according to DefJam it will be [1]). Why make another editor do the work over again? --djrobgordon 02:23, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. As much as I hate crystal ballery, I feel like being listed on the same dropdown as LL Cool J, Rihanna, and Method Man (see [2]) makes her notable enough. She's also been mentioned on Billboard, as a singer/fellow labelmate of Ghostface Killah, which seems to meet the non-trivial media mention aspect of WP:MUSIC. I'd also say it's pretty much guaranteed at this point that the album will exist, so as long as the article does not contain any speculation, I feel it's reasonable to keep. No prejudice to recreate if this is deleted, of course. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep per Kinu. --Terence Ong 02:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per djrobgordon Hawkestone 03:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Clear case of crystal ballism. Many artist sign for record companies and fail to make an impact. Just because she's sceduled to release an album, doesn't mean it will sell, it might not even get released, it has happend before. Eivind^speak! 04:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep and improve. Major label, big producer, music-presss coverage; sounds notable even if the main album hasn't been released. ProhibitOnions 10:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all the site says is coming soon - doesnt mean anything Defunkier 13:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. While Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, it's not an ostrich, either. Monicasdude 13:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: as per nominator. --Ragib 16:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep to avoid wasted effort and discourage similar nominations. Osomec 20:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep somewhat known.
• Keep Two frivolous nomination Hektor 06:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete look at first delete reason. Newyorktimescrossword 07:07, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per djrobgordon. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 12:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, WP:NOT an ostrich, whatever that means. Yamaguchi先生 01:35, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. WP:NOT a crystal ball. Cursive 21:38, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Rochell's album has been confirmed for a summer release date. The single has already been added to 38 radio stations, and has an official R&R radio package associated with it confirming that an album is on it's way. Jibertiber 010:48, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.