Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Burns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Flowerparty☀ 12:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Megan Burns

Two bit parts in movies and a non notable band do not make you notable or worth of an encylopedia entry...do they? Delete KsprayDad 23:32, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. She starred in 28 Days Later, which pulled in nearly $45 million in the American box office. Aplomado ^talk 23:40, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, as she starred in 28 Days Later. Carioca 23:53, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

are we going to have EVERYONE that was in that movie considered notable? It was a bit part, she has one other non notable movie to her name and an non notable music career. Perhaps a two line summary of her should be added to the cast listings for the movie itself.KsprayDad 00:55, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete not notable enough ---|Newyorktimescrossword 02:32, 8 May 2006 (UTC)|
• Keep. Hannah is not a bit part in 28 Days..., it's probably the third lead. If it were, I'd say Delete. -- GWO
• Keep - She's doing lots of promo for her debut album and single, and has had quite a lot of press coverage, including the nationals.
• Keep - Anyone who know's of her career knows it's due for a rise, The band just played at download 2006... surely that makes her more notable

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.