Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mattressology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. alphaChimp^(talk) 14:48, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mattressology

Neologism (1100 Ghits), most of the content is either obvious or possible spam. --ais523 12:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Only 127 distinct Ghits here mainly mirrors of each other. Protologism. Dlyons493 Talk 13:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - This fails WP:NEO and is possiblity vanity as the article creator is named Furshpan and the coiner of the term is Dr. Furshpan.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 14:31, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This is not a word, and nor should it be. Horrible. BTLizard 14:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above, especially BTLizard. --Huon 15:03, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Gay Cdn's vanity comment. Incidentally, this same user Furshpan created Spinal Decay, which begins "Spinal Decay is a term coined by Dr. Bernard Furshpan ...." Michael Kinyon 07:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • CommentThe Spinal Decay photos are clearly marked copyright Bernard Furshpan, so, unless user Furshpan can prove he's Dr. Bernard Furshpan in real life, we're in breach of copyright. OTOH, if they are really one and the same, we're dealing with WP:Vanity. Dlyons493 Talk 11:32, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.