Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Horgan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Matthew Horgan

Likely hoax. No relevant Google hits for "Matthew Horgan" "All White". Author has also created other apparent hoax articles.-gadfium 05:35, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom--Jusjih 06:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, this page seems to indicate the subject is still in the high school listed in the article, as of 7/29/06. Nothing else relevant appears on Google, and no sources are provided in article. -- H·G (^words/_works) 07:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as hoax (see WP:SPEEDY general criteria No. 1), as per above and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2006_August_3#Simon_George. --BrownHairedGirl 08:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Hoaxes are not covered by that criterion, as Wikipedia:Patent nonsense emphatically explains. Uncle G 14:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete hoax. Ziggurat 08:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per WP:HOAX Thε Halo ^Θ 11:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as per above Dlyons493 Talk 12:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as hoax. Does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion. Molerat 14:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. A search of an Australian New Zealand database comes up with 0 hits for "Matthew Horgan" which would be unlikely if he was the goalkeeper of the New Zealand soccer side. Distinct verifiability problems with this article. Given that this article refers to a drinking problem, it might be eligible as an attack page.Capitalistroadster 03:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 03:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a blatant hoax. Calling this an attack page would probably be a stretch, since the article doesn't disparage its subject for having a drinking problem. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:46, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.