Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mastadex Hero Editor (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:21, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mastadex Hero Editor

This non-notable character editor for Diablo II survived a previous AfD nomination in March 2006, mainly due to lack of interest. You can see the nomination here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mastadex Hero Editor.

I'm relisting it today in hopes of attracting a few more editors to the AfD. The article is non-notable and vanity. Receives only 160 unique Google hits, where "Jamella Editor" gets more than 10000 (and we don't have an article on that!). Also, fails to pass ANY of the points in WP:SOFTWARE. Frankly, I don't think we need this article more than we need an article about all the test programs I've created in my career... Sarg 08:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails WP:SOFTWARE. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 11:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• delete to take a weight off your back Bustter 14:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Yeah, doesn't look too good. I'm surprised to hear that Jamella doesn't have an article though; seems more like a missing page than a reason to delete this one. Icewolf34 14:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable cheat program. FWIW, back in the 1990s, I used to write a couple of these, albeit for simpler games... One game's hiscore file even said "don't even think about messing with these!" but it was surprisingly easy to reverse engineer. JIP | Talk 19:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Character editor -- | Shishir Rane | talk | 05:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • It's been up for merging for quite a while: I wrote the character editor article just because this article "survived" AfD and felt this might be worth mentioning in an article about the generic concept. No one has bothered to merge it so far - and even I couldn't, considering how few "interesting" features this generally non-notable software has... It's just a character editor that's utterly unremarkable. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 08:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as I said in previous AfD. Just not notable enough and there's little interesting stuff to be said about it. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 08:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.