Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masonic architects

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Cryptic 19:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Masonic architects

WP is not a collection of indiscriminate information (or a list of lists). This is an "article" about notable people who were architects (to some degree) and Masons, but these people already have bio articles where this information rightfully belongs. The talk page for the article also implies that the author is looking for help with research in this area rather than knowing about the topic, and I don't think WP is meant to be a collaborative research group that one person can then take credit for. MSJapan 17:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nominator and WP:NOT. --BrownHairedGirl ^{(talk) • (contribs)} 19:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT. Hello32020 19:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Mukadderat 17:46, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete whilst I would take issue with MSJapan's comment that 'the author is looking for help with research', infact I was looking for other contributors to edit and if neccessary completely rewrite the article, I do agree that the article does not fullfill the criteria of a standard entry and it could perhaps molre properly be included within the main entry on Freemasonry. My main reason for writing the article is that there is very little information on Freemasonic architects on the web that is both objective and verifiable, and I do think the subject matter warrants an article or sub-entry at least.bamboodragon 18:16, 29 October 2006
• Delete It's listcruft, but it could always be transwiki'd using Special:Export to another wiki (if someone wants to set up their own wiki on Wikia that could be a place for this!) SunStar Net 19:21, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.