Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason Smillie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 06:15, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mason Smillie

Non notable. A google search for "Mason Smillie" yields six hits, none of which (except a sentence in the Wikipedia article for Tyson Beckford, which the author of this article added to that one) have anything to do with the subject of this article. FuriousFreddy 23:31, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

• Keep provided that the individual in question does actually exist. The mere fact of an individual's existence makes him notable enough for inclusion. Kurt Weber 00:04, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. We certainly don't need an entry for every person on the planet. -- Necrothesp 02:21, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Actually, we do. Kurt Weber 23:37, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Existence is not criteria for inclusion. That's why we have phone books. Ifnord 03:55, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Actually, it is. Kurt Weber 23:37, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. --TM ^(talk) 09:03, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as above. Garr 00:06, 4 November 2005 (UTC)\
• Delete Foosher 03:42, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.