Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martirano
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete, then restore four most recent revisions. Mindmatrix 21:04, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Martirano
non notability, vanity Melaen 16:25, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
I think I went to high school in San Clemente with this guy. He was kind of nuts. Good guitar player though wayverunner
- Group has red "link," and up-and-coming musicians generally are less notable than their groups. Delete as vanity. B.Wind 01:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, I have rewritten the article. Martirano is also an italian commune with a quite old history --Melaen 16:31, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- You shouldn't rewrite an article to be about something entirely different while the AFD is active; the band article is now permanently embedded in the edit history. You should have let the AFD run its course and then written up the valid topic after the vanity page was deleted. Bearcat 20:54, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oops! --Melaen 15:56, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- You shouldn't rewrite an article to be about something entirely different while the AFD is active; the band article is now permanently embedded in the edit history. You should have let the AFD run its course and then written up the valid topic after the vanity page was deleted. Bearcat 20:54, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Relisting due to insufficient votes. - Mailer Diablo 13:34, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and recreate to eliminate history of original article. The current version needs to be expanded greatly if it's to survive an AfD vote. B.Wind 19:14, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Do you mean that the current version, as it stands, warrants deletion? Punkmorten 19:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, Howcheng said it best. I'm not sure the new version is quite encyclopedic, but since there is a chance of possible expansion, I'd like to give the author of the new version an opportunity to do so. B.Wind 20:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- The new version is not optimal, but not bad either. It's a quite valuable addition to Wikipedia. Punkmorten 21:06, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, Howcheng said it best. I'm not sure the new version is quite encyclopedic, but since there is a chance of possible expansion, I'd like to give the author of the new version an opportunity to do so. B.Wind 20:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Do you mean that the current version, as it stands, warrants deletion? Punkmorten 19:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete then restore rewritten version. howcheng {chat} 19:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and recreate to get the bollocks out of the history Jamie (talk/contribs) 22:02, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and recreate Does not make clear sense, especially the last sentence. Poorley written so should be redone66.92.14.198 09:28, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
