Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Market Technicians Association (MTA)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SEC recognition is easy to come by. Kimchi.sg 10:22, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Market Technicians Association (MTA)

NN-trade assoc. delete DesertSky85451 16:01, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

I am also nominating the related page: Chartered Market Technician

• Keep. It's also an examination and self-regulatory organization whose credentials are recognized by the Securities and Exchange Commission. See the references that I added.--TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 17:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Being a government certified gathering of beancounters does not, in itself, an encyclopedic subject make --Aim Here 02:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Chartered Market Technician and keep that one One article seems adequate. The professional title for individuals will be more significant, I believe. GRBerry 02:25, 5 November 2006 (UTC) Modifying my opinion; we should only have one now, but which one it should be is not as clear. GRBerry 02:48, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per Aim Here and nom. Also seems to be part of a walled-garden series of vanity edits by one of the organization officers. --Calton | Talk 04:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 16:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:42, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete importance is unclear. Arbusto 00:24, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.