Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandarin Emperor style dildo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Proto::type 12:38, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mandarin Emperor style dildo

Has been speedily deleted once as an hoax. Let us bring it here just in case it is true. -- RHaworth 06:56, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Two Ghits. Danny Lilithborne 07:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:V. If this was deleted before, then the author should know to reference their sources when recreating. Caknuck 07:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep While the claims may be unverifiable, there seems to be significant possibility that this item actually exists. LionelNailer 07:24, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Many references exist to the Mandarin Emperor style on Chinese language sex blogs. I will attempt to reference when I have time. MingNei 07:26, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • The above two votes where added by the same user MingNei [1]▪◦▪≡Ѕirex98≡ 08:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — Delete please. So far, no references, and as a Chinese myself, "Mandarin Emperor" is not a term used - it's "Chinese Emperor", or "Han Emperor" - which further raises my eyebrows about this article's contents. –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) | Review 07:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete This is a hoax. google results Mandarin Emperor style dildo the the original article created by User:Fredsavage had used a photo from this website[2] prior to speedy deletion with an incorrect image licence. the user also had a Inappropriate username Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/User_names Nothing else is known about this claim except for one website. this shows it to be a hoax... from robfeist.spaces.live.com

"I assume that by this time tomorrow, this whole thing will be gone off Wikipedia. But for one brief, shining moment, the world knew the wonder and majesty of the Mandarin Emperor Dildo." "Edit as of 8:30 AM Saskatchewan time: Due to issues with having no sense of humour, Wikipedia does not feel that my article has a place in its collection of knowledge. They include articles on the Sybian and on Teledildonics, but not the Mandarin Emperor Style. Tragic. Anyway, as this site IS a repository of knowledge, I will include the picture at the bottom. And for being the first person to respond, Jenna wins a matching Mandarin Emperor/Empress double-girth set. Which I expect to be used in some sort of video, which will ultimately gratify me. The end."

• Speedy Delete - What are we coming to? Mandarin flavoured dildo's?? Girls have all the fun.... ;) Spawn Man 07:56, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Eww.... What is a Mandarin-flavored anything, anyway? Perhaps Mandarin Oranges Now there's a thought... :P? –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) | Review 07:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep I have added Chinese language references to the existence of this item. Original may have been a hoax, but actual evidence exists in Chinese. Type in Mandarin Emperor dildo to BabelFish, and search results in Chinese language. WeiWei11
  • One add - reviewing comments, KungMing is correct... this should be called a Han Emperor dildo. Perhaps page name should be changed to so reflect.WeiWei11
  • WeiWei11 only contributions [3] ▪◦▪≡Ѕirex98≡ 08:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete in the absence of verifiability. —Angr 08:53, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Note: I've stricken several !votes above that checkuser reveals are from a sizeable sockfarm being run by MingNei in an attempt to influence the result of the AFD. The underlying IP has been blocked for a week to prevent further socking during the course of the AFD. I've also cleaned up the formatting a bit to make it easier to see what is going on. Essjay (Talk) 10:46, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.