Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malacalypse the setian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Malacalypse the setian

Hard to tell what this is. Something to do with Dischordianism but it seems like original work. Andrew Levine 15:41, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete This article is so poorly written and incomplete that it is not even clear what it is about. --dtony 19:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as patent nonsense. Regular delete then. No way to tell what it's supposed to be. Little or no context. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 05:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Please do not abuse the speedy deletion criteria. This article is comprehensible and is not patent nonsense. Uncle G 14:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Delete. While it's canon that there are actually more types of Discordianism than practicing Discordians, I think the essentially unpublished views of a one-man Episkoposary count as Original Research at the very least. They just deleted the standalone entry on Ek-sen-trik-kuh Discordia, and that group actually has a known presence outside its own pineal gland. It doesn't warrant an encyclopedia article. Also, if we start making pages for every saint and visionary recognized by every Discordian pope around, we're going to have to end up making en.disc.wikipedia.org just to handle the flow of traffic. --Parcequilfaut 07:06, 17 August 2006 (UTC) , Pope the Empress, Commander of the DoomBringer and Recommender of Deletion

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.