Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mad Max 4: Fury Road

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus (4m, 4k) - Mailer Diablo 17:25, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mad Max 4: Fury Road

Reluctantly, I have to list this here as there seems to be nothing but crystal balling going on here, with some vague and unsourced comment, a link to the IMDb page (which means nothing) and language that suggests this film may never actually be made. Too much speculation. I'm willing to withdraw this nomination if someone can revise this with proof that the film is actually going to be made. In response to the vote by David Gerard, I also support merging with Mad Max should the vote go that way. 23skidoo 07:05, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

• Merge (though there's not much information) and redirect to Mad Max - it's useful there, but WP:NOT a crystal ball as you say. I say the redirect to discourage its recreation - David Gerard 13:50, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Mad Max as per David Gerard as in put a couple of sentences and create a redirect. By the looks of things, it certainly won't have Mel Gibson in it. Capitalistroadster 19:29, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge as per David Gerard above. - Cnwb 23:48, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. Capitalistroadster 19:33, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - I cannot see the harm in keeping this, even if it is a stub. The other three films have their own articles. If it takes off then the start of an article is here. -- Ian ≡ talk 00:21, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep That speculation can all be sourced. A quick googling for the movie reveals interviews with mel gibson, george miller (the writer/director?) and other people working on it. The production of has been delayed several times, but it's still being worked on. They have released information on some of the actors who would be in it: " Australian actress Georgie Shew is indeed in talks for a role in the forthcoming Mel Gibson headed blockbuster." [1] " Also included is a brief Q&A with George Miller on the TV series, his movies, and Mad Max 4." [2] "The last thing I wanted to do is another Mad Max, but this came along..." [3]. Nathan J. Yoder 06:42, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
  • If all the above come from recent sources then it needs to be added to the article because the article gives the impression it's about a dead project -- or one that might be revived at some unknown time in the future (i.e. Star Trek 11). If it is indeed a going concern then this must be indicated by verifiable sources. 23skidoo 01:10, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
    • The above interview with George Miller appears to be copied from a July 2005 edition of Australia's Empire magazine. Nathan J. Yoder 13:03, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Snottygobble | Talk 01:05, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. There's no reason to delete it. So what if it doesn't cite sources? Many articles don't. Google it to see for yourself if it is legit.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.