Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Low Level Flight
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – Avi 04:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Low Level Flight
Looks like a vanity page for a band that does not appear to have released its first album yet. Also copyvio from this web site --Tcatts 20:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Fair enough, the guy won Canadian Idol, but there's already an article for him. Also it reads like a publicists' release. Nothing more than advertising.Bobanny 20:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Even though the article is about to go in the crapper, we shouldn't allow copyvios. I removed it[1] and left the bare facts (also removed the incorrect categories). EVula 21:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I hope I'm weighing in my thoughts correctly as outlined in the guidelines. I created this article. I did it to give information regarding this person's new band, which is seperate from his Idol career, and thus (in my opinion) should be seperate from his personal page. I thought it would be useful to be able to link from one page to another to give people a chance to read more of about the band itself and alone from the person. FYI: I am also one of the contributors to the band's website, and have permission to use the content from the site and have the photographer's permission to use the photo (if there is a way I should have credited that, forgive me). I also disagree that it is nothing more than advertising. "Buy Our Album" is advertising, this is information.. articles about other bands, movies, actors, artists, books, writers, etc are permitted in the encyclopedia and are not considered advertising for their work, correct? --LLFRyan 08:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
