Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loscil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Bobet 21:05, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Loscil

Non-notable band. Although they do have an AMG page, it didn't say that they did anything notable or met WP:MUSIC. T REX_speak 20:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• I would say that his relatively sizeable presence in AMG is a clear indication of meeting WP:MUSIC. Keep. Punkmorten 21:02, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Actually being in AMG is not part of WP:MUSIC T REX_speak 21:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
    • If it helps any, Loscil gets 152,000 google hits and is on a fairly prominent Experimental music label. (Kranky Records).Andrzejbanas 05:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
    • All loscil albums have been reviewed in major music publications too such as All Music Guide, and Pitchforkmedia. He also has been played on the Canada wide radio brocast for CBC Radio and has had articles in New Music Canada. He may be obscure, but he's definitly noteworthy.Andrzejbanas 06:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, per Andrzejbanas' unsigned comment above. Multiple press coverage means he passes WP:MUSIC. Kappa 06:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • whoops forgot to sign. :) Andrzejbanas 06:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - certainly a well known figure in international experimental music, appropriate coverage demonstrated above, 3 albums on a notable indie label. Quite surprised to see this one on AfD actually...Ac@osr 13:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.