Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Peter Ravenscroft

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. · Katefan0^(scribble) 16:27, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Lord Peter Ravenscroft

Hoax. Google is silent about this person. -- RHaworth 06:00:37, 2005-09-05 (UTC)

• Searching for Lord Ravenscroft gives more hits, but I'd still like this deleted as it's unverifiable and based on rumors. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:33, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I would wager my top hat that this is a lot of old tommyrot, hey what. Peeper 09:08, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. What a load of cobblers. Vizjim 09:46, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. A cursory scan of genealogy sites suggests that there is no extant British hereditary peerage in any Ravenscroft family, much less a younger son with this name and career. AlexTiefling 13:38, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Hoax. Amren ^(talk) 16:53, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unverifyable. If this gets deleted, make sure that he is removed from January 12 as well. --Apyule 01:10, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, unverified (when British peerage is fully documented). From the article: "These claims have been fiercely reputed by his living family." Huh? "Repudiated" perhaps? Barno 15:38, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn and possible hoax; I found only a mirror of this article at a (hijacked?) company website---CH (talk) 05:14, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.