Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lockblocker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lockblocker

Neologism —C.Fred (talk) 05:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Agreed. Even Urban Dictionary might not take it, and certainly not Wiktionary. --maru (talk) contribs 05:31, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. We need a neon sign on the main page to refrain from posting articles on neologisms.--Fuhghettaboutit 05:34, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
  • The neon sign idea is great, until the newbies come up with a term for it and write an article about it.... :) —C.Fred (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Silly Neologism. Anyone create a new portmanteau word to describe anything, without understanding that it's inconsequential. - Peripitus (Talk) 06:44, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism copied from urbandictionary - Motor (talk) 08:37, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per Motor.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  10:00, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete yet another neogalism Ydam 12:10, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. --Coredesat 12:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• delete Funny, though. I hate lockblockers. Adambiswanger1 14:06, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 01:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.