The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 12:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete sadly I don't see any evidence of notabilityCharlesknight 22:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- Hawaiian717 22:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom; also a copyvio from [1]. ... discospinstertalk 00:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom Dlyons493Talk 00:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Weak delete and sadly. --Nigel(Talk) 12:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.