Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of war heroes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 01:12, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of war heroes

Was tagged for speedy deletion by CHawke as a repost of List of people known as war heroes (AfD discussion) but it's not the same. Probert notes in the edit history that the creator, Swedenman is a known troll on Swedish Wikipedia. Regardless, it's an inherently POV list that's unreferenced. howcheng {chat} 18:48, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Speculative and POV. No guidelines. Theoretically you can say Hitler is a war hero --† Ðy§ep§ion † 19:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment this list would seem to have a lot in common with Hero#People_traditionally_recognized_as_heroes Jcuk 20:56, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, inherently POV. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 21:22, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, POV no single definition of "hero" can be applied that meets NPOV --C Hawke 07:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Probert 11:28, 3 February 2006 (UTC) (Yes, Swedenman is a troll. He is identical with Filipman on Swedish Wikipedia. He has been blocked 6 times [1] for rabid edit wars and abuse of other wikipedians.)
• Delete - POV by definition. --Latinus (talk (el:)) 17:07, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete another speculative list; even if some agreed-upon source decided to name its top 100 war heroes, we ought to delete that as well, per all the lists of "best songs", "most annoying songs", "worst dictators" floating around the AfD pages. Carlossuarez46 23:57, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete... completely POV, among other things. --Kinu 08:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I would add that having lexicographically sorted list of names for several millenia is not very useful. Pavel Vozenilek 22:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.