Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of anagrams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  15:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of anagrams

I've submitted this page for deletion as I can't see that it has anything to do with an encyclopedia. There are dozens of website on the net that have lists of anagrams and that is where this page belongs - on a personal website or a blog entry, IMO not wikipedia.

If anyone wants to restructure it in some radical way, great, but all I see is a list of randomly chosen anagrams, many of which are original research and have no base on the web. Mglovesfun 19:12, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 22:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Delete - appears to be a humour piece plagiarized from elsewhere. The USSR's name was the cause of their downfall? oops. Still, Unencyclopedic.Michael Dorosh 16:43, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

• Strong delete haven't even found a single reference. Addhoc 13:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Neither useful nor funny. Pavel Vozenilek 15:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. per nom. --Ktdreyer 16:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. fails WP:NOT as an indiscriminate collection of information. Thε Halo ^Θ 16:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per The Halo. There are an infinite number of anagrams, these are some of them, chosen at random. --Xyzzyplugh 16:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, intriguing as some of these might be, WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Eel Ted, not encyclopedic. Nuttah68 21:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Mglovesfun 00:06, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.