Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of advertisement agencies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:56, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] List of advertisement agencies
Non-encyclopedic list, impossible to maintain; and right now it's also advertising for the one company on the list. - squibix 15:21, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - squibix 15:21, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Advert. mdd4696 15:36, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom + spam. Too bad it does not meed any criteria for speed. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 16:11, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination, and redirect to Advertising agency which has a better list of major ad agencies. --Metropolitan90 17:34, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete spam, and a spam magnet. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 18:57, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep I cleaned up the article and got rid of the spam. Well, the list could be encyclopedic if it listed the major ones such as Saatchi and Saatchi, Omnicom Group, and TBWA\Chiat\Day. However, the list is clearly created by a person related to the company so it makes automatically an ad and the advertising agency article has already listed the "major" ones and the category "Advertising agency" is doing it is job as a "list." If you think "impossible to maintain" then we should delete List of computer and video game companies, Lists of companies, etc., :-P --J. Nguyen 23:40, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep now and extract the list from advertising agency, or failing that merge into advertising agency. Kappa 01:58, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Edwardian 06:58, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. *drew 18:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
