Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pokémon berries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:18, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of Pokémon berries

This list of berries reads like a guide and was tagged transwiki to Wikibooks. I sent the article there, where it was promptly deleted. Regardless of whether or not it belongs on Wikibooks as a guide, it doesn't belong here. TheProject 18:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Havok (T/C/c) 07:31, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• on the one hand it is a valuable source of information for any kid interested in this stuff, but on the other hand it is entirely unencylopedic in format and style.Adambiswanger1 19:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete listcruft. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• I know this is going to sound CRAZY, but this might be decent if there was a seperate article FOR EACH BERRY - then you could have a decent sourced list with a small sentence for each berry. RN 19:47, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete and do not merge. Wikipedia is not a game guide Bwithh 20:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete ugly marriage of listcruft and gamecruft. Arkyan 21:23, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - listcruft and gaming guide. --P199 21:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete burninate this crap. Danny Lilithborne 01:40, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 18:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 18:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete--Peta 02:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Can you compare it with berry dex? Highway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 18:31, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Bwithh -- Hirudo 06:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.