Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Macintosh software
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:28, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] List of Macintosh software
Delete. This information is better presented as a category. Which we already have Category:Mac OS software. AlistairMcMillan 23:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, most of this information cannot be presented as a category. Kappa 11:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep agree withUser:Kappa, article has information in headings and additional description which would be lost if this were turned into a category. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Richardshusr (talk • contribs) 17:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- Headings could be represented by sub-categories. or whatever. The additional description belongs in the articles themselves, where it can be sourced. AlistairMcMillan 18:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- The additional description will presumably be in the first paragraphy of the article and can be confirmed by clicking the link to it. Users shouldn't have to randomly try articles until they find the kind of thing they are looking for. Kappa 23:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Headings could be represented by sub-categories. or whatever. The additional description belongs in the articles themselves, where it can be sourced. AlistairMcMillan 18:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, complements the category very well by presenting information in a different form. Thryduulf 18:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, useful information Marc 23:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Richardshusr and Thryduulf. Michael Kinyon 12:08, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Markovich292 06:12, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
