Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Generation Yers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:43, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] List of Generation Yers

Basically, a list of anybody and everybody born after 1976. Also doesn't jibe with the Generation Y article, which says somebody born in the late 80s or later. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:41, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. -- Captain Disdain 06:57, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. —Wayward ^Talk 12:42, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Pointless. Devotchka 16:29, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

There is no consensus listed in the Generation Y article as to what is Generation Y. There is no established consensus as of yet in culture as to what is Generation Y. 1977 is the earliest year counted as Generation Y, and therefore it is prudent to include it in such a listing.

• Delete, we have categories for people born this and that year. Punkmorten 19:05, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Better, and more completly covered in the catagory listing. As this article is now, simply listcruft. Stu 20:13, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, pointless listcruft. MCB 01:15, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• DeleteJust a list of people born after 1976 which could incle a big chunk of the palnet.--Dakota 01:40, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. We can't make an accurate list on this topic until all of the media pundits agree on who a Gen-Yer is. And if the Gen Y article asserts specific criteria, that's pretty misleading. I have heard so many different definitions on Gen Y just on CNN alone! Jacqui ^{★ 15:24, 31 October 2005 (UTC)}
• Keep. Lack of concensus doesn't change the fact that these people were born in these years, and it is convenient to have them listed together as such. Also, it's a shame that nattering nabobs want to go around scorching the work of others. Ryoung122 07:55, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.