Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Baekje researchers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Although the suggestion of merging doesn't seem to have persuaded here, this doesn't preclude merging in the future. A discussion on the talk page would be more suitable for the purpose that another deletion nomination. --Tony Sidaway 23:26, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of Baekje researchers

Too specialized a topic to have an article on its researchers. Perhaps merge or move to an article about researchers of Korean history in general, but I think even that's pushing it Hirudo 00:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep or merge somewhere. No reason wikipedia users shouldn't be able to find examples of authorities in this field. Kappa 00:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Merge if the names are worth keeping - how about with Korean history. Tyrenius 01:16, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Baekje. It needs more sources and citations anyway. — AKADriver ☎ 01:42, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

  Comment - the second link was dead, so I only merged the first one into Baekje. No need for a redirect that I can see. — AKADriver ☎ 03:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

• Merge this somewhere in the case that it is not seriously expanded with further names and sources. If it were, I would change my vote to keep. Kuzaar 14:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep on the basis it has the potential to be expanded and become quite interesting. Would maybe come under systemic bias? Jcuk 21:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. No reason to delete this, and I can't think of a better place to have this information. There is also the potential for expansion. — TheKMan^talk 20:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.