Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life's Blood
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 17:04, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Life's Blood
Band failing WP:MUSIC, come back when you have a record deal and a couple albums. Stifle 01:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Keep The band did a recording and was apparently instrumental in the music scene of the time. --Walter Görlitz 02:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep per above. -- JJay 02:31, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep One member of the band went on to join another band which already has an article. According to WP:MUSIC, it qualifies for Wikipedia by that alone. --- CorbinSimpson 02:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep based on above. I've never heard of them personally, but if there's even just a hint of notability we ought to keep it imho. --kingboyk 04:58, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: The key is Adam Nathanson, the connection between this band and Born Against. Turn the red link into blue and merge this article into the new article. By itself, Life's Blood barely misses the notoriety bar (note the sea of red links in the article... and the lack of mention of Life's Blood in Born Against), but the article shouldn't be totally erased. B.Wind 18:15, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- keep as per above Jcuk 19:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems notable enough. --Andylkl [ talk! | c ] 12:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
"Keep" I have 2 of their 7 inches including the one with Sticks& Stones. Life's blood was just as much a part of the NYHC scene as anyone else, even if they were short lived. The article is informative as I didn't know some of the info that was in it.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.