Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legendary Frog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. — JIP | Talk 19:10, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Legendary Frog

I found this article by following a link on Talk:Joseph Blanchette. The link admits to cheating, and that article was deleted in this AfD. Whilst I have no opinion, I think this article should also been seen by AfD. Note that it is not speediable as a recreation, really, since it is a rewrite (just). -Splash^talk 16:59, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and rename to Joseph Blanchette. It seems to me the article on Joseph Blanchette was deleted in error, the subject is clearly notable enough. --Mysidia (talk) 18:17, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
• keep rewrite After reading the article and talk, I agree. — brighterorange (talk) 19:09, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep
• Keep for reasons given on the talk pages of both articles, as well as my objections to the original VfD on the other article. And the "cheating" line was probably a joke, man. (As for the naming aspect, people are just as likely to search for Legendary Frog as Joseph Blanchette; he puts both names on every movie he does. Whatever happens, one should redirect to the other.) CaptHayfever 03:43, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish 18:38, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep (disclosure: I created this page). I'm not sure I can say much more than what I've already said elsewhere. If we are to have any articles on flash animated artists/series at all (and we certainly do), then Legendary Frog is more than notable enough for inclusion. (I have a much bigger defence for keeping this article, in the article's talk page - please go there.) In any case, whatever the outcome of this vfd, I'm relieved that this issue will finally see some formal resolution. Wandering oojah 15:02, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Oh, as for my comment about 'cheating', yes, I was mostly joking. It's true I created this article in a, ah, fairly sneaky manner...but I was also under the impression that rewriting deleted articles, when there is due cause, is generally tolerated on Wikipedia. Wandering oojah 15:02, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.