Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leenn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Userfied since it was created by the subject. Left a note about WP:AUTO on user page. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 23:31, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Leenn

Vanity, nothing but an advertisment. Lightdarkness 08:06, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as nom. --Lightdarkness 08:07, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Gazpacho 08:07, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Hirudo 08:08, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Why not speedy? -- Mikeblas 08:12, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I didn't see advertisment under speedy criteria --Lightdarkness 08:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - Axver 08:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity, just advertisement Dakota ~ ε 08:28, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable website. No Alexa traffic rank. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-25 09:58Z
• Delete as advert. --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 20:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - advertising. Latinus 20:27, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy since it was very obviously created by the subject under an account with the same name. In fact, I'll do it now... - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 23:31, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.