Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learninghour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:10, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Learninghour

This article is a disguised link spam. The article Tutor gets linked spam on a regular basis, but this time it was done in a smarter way [1]. This mention has already been deleted, but the article needs also to be cleaned up. Delete - wikipedia is not for advertisement. Tony Bruguier 14:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, spamvertising. NawlinWiki 18:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 16:00, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Merge/redirect to E-learning maybe? Or would that be linkspamming? --HResearcher 10:38, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 23:37, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Not convinced that this company is verifiably notable. -AED 00:55, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 02:47, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — per nom. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 16:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Fucking delete. Erwin 21:04, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.