Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Parker Meridien
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete with no redirect as per Pascal.Tesson. -- Kjkolb 11:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Le Parker Meridien
Hotels should be at Wikitravel. No claim to notability Fram 13:13, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Weak Keep. Important enough of a hotel to keep around, but it needs expansion and context. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 13:46, 29 June 2006 (UTC)- Cheap redirect to Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, the parent MNC. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 18:32, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete no showing of significance whatsoever. Very few hotels should be on WP. - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete, non-notable hotel. We're not Wikitravel. Hotels can't be transwikied to Wikitravel through AfD, so the decision is all that much easier to make. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 22:35, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- There is nothing really to transwiki. I have no problem with deleting the history, but a redirect should be left. This is a somewhat well-known individual hotel that probably gets its fair-share of Google searches and redirecting to the above link could be good for bringing in traffic. It would also give someone a good excuse to epand the section of the article that deals with Le Meridien Hotels. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 23:23, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete. While it is true that the page could be redirected to Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide (which owns the Meridien brand) it has no particular notability. Also note that hotels in large cyber-connected cities will indeed tend to have major presence on Google but that is not indication of particular notability. Pascal.Tesson 22:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.