Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law School 100 rankings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 18:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Law School 100 rankings

Delete. This page is not verifiable. The only source is LegalTV.com, which does not exist. Copysan 00:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete No website, no information, no anything. Provides no actual knowledge. Mike 00:50, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. 9 Google hits? :) - Haukur 01:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete verifiability problems. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, per Copysan.--SarekOfVulcan 01:49, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, Wikipedia should not be used to give advice about one's educational or career future. Plus the source is not reliable, or even real. Captain Jackson 04:18, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Highly subjective. † Ðy§ep§ion † 07:16, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 08:53, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• There are no speedy deletion criteria under which this article falls. Please do not request speedy deletion unless an article satisfies one of the criteria for speedy deletion. Being unverifiable, as this article is, is grounds for normal deletion, not speedy deletion. Uncle G 11:46, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Mushin^talk 17:16, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nominated -- Krash 19:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 20:29, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete but not as speedy. Check the criteria. nn is not one of them - and for good reason. Batmanand 20:30, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete articles that lack sufficent source information. -MegamanZero|Talk 02:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. *drew 07:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.