Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LANmaniac
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete minus anonymous votes. - Mailer Diablo 10:53, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] LANmaniac
Wikipedia is not an announcement board for LAN parties - unenclopedic. Delete. --DrTorstenHenning 13:51, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. NN. mdd4696 15:18, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 16:27, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Durova 16:34, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Turnstep 16:47, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Rogerd 03:47, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
The article I wrote does not announce dates or times of LAN events, but scratches on the surface of what LM is. With enough time and contributions, my goal is to make the article's format close to that of the Quakecon article. Please give it a few more days for the other attendees to kick in their own edits and work on the history section. Save.--24.55.215.136 05:15, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
> Informative, educational topic about a growing culture. Surprising, that an ONLINE encyclopedia would move so quick to censor the acurate and truth about an established history making LAN party such as LANmaniac. It is real, it deserves to be recognized, so that people who have never been to a regularly scheduled LANmaniac-sytled event may embrace the information found here at Wikipedia. Save.--68.233.242.29 07:53, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Save: The LANmaniac wiki is a work in progress. Please bear with us for the next few days as our members make their contributions. Thanks!--67.101.165.248 08:13, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
>This is just an informative article describing what LANmaniacs is all about. Its like the Quakecon but in more detail. There is no reason to delete something which is informing others who may beinterested in this subject. Give time to revise and edit this article
-
-
- Repeated pleas from anonymous IP addresses are not persuasive. Regular deletion takes five days. You do have time to address this. Read the article creation guidelines and adjust accordingly. You may have difficulty demonstrating noteworthiness. LASFS [1] is an example of a noteworthy club. Durova 17:39, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- While I'd love to clean up the article even further, (It's changed quite a bit since the initial post), I was unable to find the "article creation guidelines", finding only the extremely broad "Wikipedia style guidelines" which seems like a wild goose chase to determine what would sway those voting for deletion. If you could please reread the article and tell me more specifically what needs to change, I'd be happy to revise it again. As to the LASFS, I'm not really sure how that's related since it's written in the first person and not even on Wikipedia. --24.55.215.136 23:37, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Repeated pleas from anonymous IP addresses are not persuasive. Regular deletion takes five days. You do have time to address this. Read the article creation guidelines and adjust accordingly. You may have difficulty demonstrating noteworthiness. LASFS [1] is an example of a noteworthy club. Durova 17:39, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
-
- Delete. Unencyclopedic. *drew 18:32, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
