Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L.A. Timez
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 04:37, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] L.A. Timez
Contested PROD. Reason for prod in the original: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Add to that: Google searches bring up a grand total of 128 hits, dropped to 50 when qualifying it with film. Nothing in IMDB. Lastly, it reads like an ad blurb. Recommend deletion and a redirect to Los Angeles Times as a misspelling/typoみ使い Mitsukai 19:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom this is non-notable, crystal ball and not verifiable. Gwernol 23:19, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- User:Demonte Morton is just writing about a movie he wishes to produce one day. Delete as utterly made-up. Wikipedia is not your imagination. Also, Do Not Redirect to Los Angeles Times, just delete it. Nobody is going to spell it that way, at least not looking for a big US newspaper, they're not. Mike H. That's hot 23:21, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above --TonySt 23:23, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOT a crystal ball and likely WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 01:43, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:50, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete unless it can be shown to be verifiable. I couldn't verify it on google however. [1] ---J.Smith 19:46, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete until this becomes verifiable for reasons already given. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:26, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
