Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kung Pow 2: Tongue of Fury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was snowy delete. Sango123 (e) 16:20, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kung Pow 2: Tongue of Fury

WP:NOT a crystal ball, it even says in the article that no release date or even a production start date is known at this time. The two external links are not useful nither Delete Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete since the movie isn't even in production yet so there's no guarantee that it will actually make it to movie screens. No prejudice against recreating the article once it's officially announced, however. Aplomado ^talk 00:31, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no IMDb page. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 01:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete recreate when future release is assured - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 02:12, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete even the supposed director agrees with the nominator in the cited interview. Kevin 02:26, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete alas, a rumour only. Ziggurat 02:46, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. As a sidenote, "Kung Pow: Enter the Fist" is absolutely one of the worst movies I've ever seen. -- Kicking222 03:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This is probably worth a line as an "upcoming project" at Steve Oedekerk, but it's not worth its own page yet. --rewtguy 04:03, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per CrazyRussian Chuck^(척뉴넘) 08:51, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn, IMDB hasn't had a page on this, not enough verifiable sources, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Terence Ong 10:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. DakPowers (Talk) 19:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Jaranda. Aspern 21:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. ILovePlankton ^{( L)} 22:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. — ßottesiηi ^(talk) 23:46, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, but Merge. While such little content (for a hypethetical movie) doesn't desurve it's own article, the information might prove interesting as a fact on the Kung Pow article. - Tomodachigai
• Delete per nom. Recreate if there's ever an official announcement or production. Voice of Treason 15:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• This can still be used as a deterrent to inform people that there was no sequel actually made, by clarifying the signifigance to it's "trailer" at the end of the first movie as a misnomer film. Or at least up until the period when Oedekirk has a green light for the project.

Aside from that, Steve Oedekirk has every intention of finishing his trilogy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.162.172.31 (talk • contribs).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.