Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuala Lumpur City Centre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirected to Kuala Lumpur.  (aeropagitica)  09:23, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kuala Lumpur City Centre

DeleteThis article offers nothing that isn't arleady included in the Kuala Lumpur article.Tombride 08:36, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to Kuala Lumpur Where ^(talk) 17:06, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect as per Where. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 00:30, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. This editor has created countless articles just like this one, and appears to be totally ignoring suggestions other editors have made on his talkpage regarding making articles that are actually useful. --Icarus 06:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless the main KL page is in need of a sub-article. Doesn't seem to be the case. Marskell 07:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Kuala Lumpur, a useless article and there's no need for such an article for the time being. --Terence Ong 09:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. Royboycrashfan 22:44, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I would say redirect, but how many times would the redirect be used? I would think very few. Timrem 02:31, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.