Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristin kramer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted as recreation of previously deleted content. Capitalistroadster 02:19, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kristin kramer

Non-notable member of club, [1] Naconkantari e|t||c|m 23:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: per nom. --Hetar 23:32, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

She is not a "non-notable member". She was the leader of the large New York District. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gregloveandkristinlove (talk • contribs).

Above user has < 10 edits. Royboycrashfan 23:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

• I have put a speedy delete on it. It's a repost of previously deleted material; see first entry in its History log --BillC 23:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. Royboycrashfan 23:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete links in the article are misleading too. A governor of a disctrict club shouldn't link, at first glance the blues give notability that is misleading. T K E 23:38, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

The original article had reason to be deleted. However, the current article is relevent and accurate. —This unsigned comment was added by Gregloveandkristinlove (talk • contribs) .

• Please follow proper wiki conventions in this vote, and also you are only allowed to vote once. The only difference to the article is the addition of "also lieu-gov" and one external link. WP:Vanity. T K E 23:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete and possibly protect page to stop it from coming back yet again. I note that Kristin Kramer is already deleted and protected. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:06, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

So...what was the actual reason for deleting this relevant and accurate article? The original article was deleted for good reason. I requested it to be unprotected (as I had good reason) and it was granted. The article as it appeared a little while ago had no reason to be deleted.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gregloveandkristinlove (talk • contribs).

• Speedy delete: G4 (if appropriate) or A7 with no assertion of notability. Even the leader of the national organization itself should be nothing more than a mention at Key Club. State officers do not meet WP:BIO. --Kinu ^t/_c 00:34, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per Kinu, with the clarification that this is a former state leader. I'm sure it looked great on her college applications, but no way does it make her notable. Fan1967 01:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.